PC PSU and Monitor Power Consumption Testing

Methodology and Results

These power consumption tests performed were tuned to only show differences in power usage according to the power supply used.  The Core 2 Quad rigs used were virtually identical, running the same load test with the same number of HDD’s (4 disconnected from power on one). The i7 machine was completely different so it could not be used in direct comparison to the Core 2 Quad machines.

The test chosen to simulate processor load was a high definition Planet Earth video that was looped. This was chosen because the Core 2 Quads performed similarly with HD video,  with the processors running at around 30-40% (see link #1).  This roughly simulated normal use of the computer over a one-hour period. Note that the two Intel Core 2 Quads, although sharing a similar clock rate, had different manufacturing processes (q8200: 45nm, q6600: 65nm) resulting in a significant difference in power consumption. The results below show that the power supply has only a slight effect on power consumption compared to the selection of efficient processors (see link #2).

#1: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2quad-q9400_6.html
#2: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2quad-q9400_11.html

Another consideration was the amount of power required to process the same task when comparing processors.  In the i7 test, the processor would always consume more power when sitting idle or under load. However, an i7 could complete a job faster than the Core 2 Quads,which means that it is still relatively energy efficient when considering the time it takes to complete a task.  Therefore the total power required to do work is fairly balanced (see link #3).

#3: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/quad-core-cpu,2499-9.html

Please note the absence of Core 2 Duo tests on our systems.  In link #2, the Core 2 Duo was shown to be the most power efficient,so we assumed that the it would perform better than the quads in our tests as well.  As such, we  do not have any quantitative data to show for it at this time.  If a Core 2 Duo becomes available, it would be a good idea to perform tests on it.  Additionally, the max watt and amp values were all experienced on startup (as expected) but were not as consistent as the average values.  Therefore, the more erratic readings would likely disappear if more start up tests were averaged out.

Quad Core / Core 2 Duo on Identical Rigs

Test # Under Load Processor Power Supply kWh Watts (W) Amps (A)
1 No Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @2.33GHZ Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
.08 87-90 Avg
114 Max
0.76 Avg
1.21 Max
2 Yes Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @2.33GHZ Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
0.10 108-112 Avg
116 Max
0.96 Avg
1.01 Max
3 No Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @2.33GHZ Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max
0.09 93 Avg118 Max 0.82 Avg1.11 Max
4 Yes Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 @2.33GHZ Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max
0.11 113-116 Avg
118 Max
0.99-1.02 Avg
1.05 Max
5 No Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHZ Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
0.10 (only just) 101 Avg141 Max 0.86 Avg
1.23 Max
6 Yes Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHZ Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
0.13 138-141144 1.15-1.22 Avg
1.25 Max
7 No Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHZ Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max
0.10 107-110 Avg
163 Max
0.95 Avg
1.43 Max
8 Yes Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHZ Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max
0.14 147-153 Avg 1.37 Avg
9 No Core 2 Duo? Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
10 Yes Core 2 Duo? Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
11 No Core 2 Duo? Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max
12 Yes Core 2 Duo? Corsair CMPSU-650TX
650W Max

Separate i7 Test

Test # Under Load Processor Power Supply kWh Watts (W) Amps (A)
1 No I7 920 Antec BP 550 Plus
550W Max
0.09 91 Avg153 Max 0.80 Avg1.30 Max
2 Yes I7 920 Antec BP 550 Plus
550W Max
0.11 100-116 Avg166 Max 0.89 Avg1.44 Max
3 No I7 920 Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
0.09 87-88 Avg
341 Max
0.75 Avg
2.93 Max
4 Yes I7 920 Seasonic X-650 (SS-650KM Active PFC F3)
650W Max
0.10 94-108 Avg
160 Max
0.82-0.98 Avg
1.36 Max
5 No I7 920 Corsair CMPSU- 650TX650W Max 0.09 89 Avg
162 Max
0.79-0.81 Avg
1.42 Max
6 Yes I7 920 Corsair CMPSU- 650TX650W Max 0.10 99-110 Avg
155 Max
0.88-1.00 Avg
1.37 Max


Monitors

Test # Monitor Size Dimensions Volts (V) kWh Watts (W) Amps (A)
1 Samsung Syncmaster 723N 17” 13.25” X 10.5” 119 0.01 10 Avg11 Max 0.26 Avg0.28 Max
2 Acer X223W 22” 18.63” X 11.63” 119 0.01 15 Avg36 Max 0.35 Avg0.38 Max
3 Samsung 245a 24” 20.25” X 11.5” 116 0.09 46 Avg48 Max 0.41 Avg0.42 Max
4 I-INC IF281D 28” 14.5” X 23.25” 118 0.05 62 Avg98 Max 0.55 Avg0.86 Max
5 Dell 3007WFTPT 30” 25.25” X 16” 118 0.10 116 Avg119 Max 1.05 Avg1.05 Max